We Offer Paper Writing Services on all Disciplines

Make an Order Now and we will be Glad to Help

Order Now



Ask an expert to help you with your homework

We are ready to assist you anytime.

Order Now

JMP Task

JMP Task 1 (0318)

  Not Evident Approaching Competence Competent
A. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A submission is not provided using the Web Folio Builder in Taskstream. Not applicable. The documents are submitted through the Web Folio Builder in Taskstream using the portfolio created in the Professional Roles and Values course.
A1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A professional mission statement is not provided, or the statement contains none of the required elements. The professional mission statement ineffectively addresses the required elements, or the statement is disorganized or illogical. The professional mission statement effectively addresses the required elements, and the statement is well organized and logical.
A1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career. The reflection ineffectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague. The reflection effectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
A2a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& The submission does not include an explanation, or the explanation makes no reference to the representation of the portfolio. The submission includes an inadequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported. The submission includes an adequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, and the explanation is logical and well supported.
A2b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths. The discussion illogically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, or the discussion is vague. The discussion logically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, and the discussion is sufficiently detailed.
A2c. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& The submission does not include a discussion, or the discussion makes no references to the challenges encountered during the progression of the program. The submission includes an inadequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported. The submission includes an adequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, and the discussion is logical and well supported.
A2ci. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given challenges were overcome. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague. The explanation effectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2d. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague. The explanation successfully addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2e. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An analysis is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given roles were fulfilled during the program. The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is illogical, unconvincing, or ineffective. The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is logical, convincing, and effective.
A2f. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program. The discussion ineffectively addresses how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported. The discussion effectively addresses how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program, and the discussion is logical and well supported.
B1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of quality and safety. The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague. The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
B1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety. The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety, or the discussion is poorly supported. The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety, and the discussion is well supported.
B1b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of quality and safety are not identified. The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of quality and safety. The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of quality and safety.
B1bi. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1, or the explanation is illogical. The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1, and the explanation is logical.
B2. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of the IHI certificate for the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse. The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of the importance the IHI certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, or the discussion is poorly supported or poorly reasoned. The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the importance the IHI certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, and the discussion is well supported and well reasoned.
C1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of evidence-based practice. The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague. The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
C1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice. The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice, or the discussion is poorly supported. The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice, and the discussion is well supported.
C1b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of evidence-based practice are not identified. The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of evidence-based practice. The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of evidence-based practice.
C1bi. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1, or the explanation is illogical. The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1, and the explanation is logical.
C2a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points. The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points, or the discussion does not include all of the given points. Or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported. The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, and the discussion includes all of the given points. The discussion is logical and well supported.
C2b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported. The explanation effectively addresses how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice, and the explanation is logical and well supported.
D1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of applied leadership. The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of applied leadership was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague. The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of applied leadership was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
D1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership. The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership, or the discussion is poorly supported. The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership, and the discussion is well supported.
D1b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of applied leadership are not identified. The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of applied leadership. The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of applied leadership.
D1bi. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1, or the explanation is illogical. The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1, and the explanation is logical.
D2a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership. The discussion illogically addresses the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership, or the discussion is poorly supported. The discussion logically addresses the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership, and the discussion is well supported.
E1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of community and population health. The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of community health was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or reflection is poorly reasoned or vague. The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of community health was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
E1a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health. The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health, or the discussion is poorly supported. The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health, and the discussion is well supported.
E1b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of community and population health are not identified. The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of community and population health. The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of community and population health.
E1bi. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1. The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1, or the explanation is illogical. The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1, and the explanation is logical.
E2a. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task. The discussion provides vague, implausible examples of what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task, or the discussion is poorly supported or unclear. The discussion provides specific, plausible examples of what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task, and the discussion is well supported and clear.
E2b. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to what was learned that led to the community diagnosis. The discussion addresses what was learned that led to the community diagnosis, but it is poorly supported with vague or implausible examples. The discussion addresses what was learned that led to the community diagnosis, and it is well supported with specific, plausible examples.
E2c. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population. The discussion addresses how the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population, but the discussion is poorly supported with vague or implausible examples. The discussion addresses the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population, and the discussion is well supported with specific, plausible examples.
E3. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of the AMNH certificate for the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse. The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of the importance the AMNH certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, or the discussion is poorly supported or vague. The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the importance the AMNH certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, and the discussion is well supported and sufficiently detailed.
F1. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Documents, assignments, and examples of best work are not provided. Documents, assignments, and examples of best work are provided, but they are incomplete, or they do not support mastery of all required sections. The provided documents, assignments, and examples of best work are complete, and they support mastery of all required sections.
F2. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A copy of the “Nursing Conceptual Model” and a link to the current IHI Course Catalog are not provided. Not applicable. A copy of the “Nursing Conceptual Model” and a link to the current IHI Course Catalog are provided.
F3. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A copy of an updated professional résumé is not provided. Not applicable. A copy of an updated professional résumé is provided.
F4. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& Professional references are not provided. Professional references are provided, but they do not meet at least 1 of the given requirements, or the reference provided is incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. The professional references provided meet at least 1 of the given requirements, and the reference is complete, appropriate, and logical.
F5. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A copy of the IHI certificate of completion is not provided. Not applicable. A copy of the IHI certificate of completion is provided.
F6. https://horizon.wgu.edu/web/academics/cos?topic=5011852&courseVersionId=7820002& A copy of the AMNH certificate of completion is not provided. Not applicable. A copy of the AMNH certificate of completion is provided.
G. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/71484321 The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
H. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27641407 Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

NOTE:
We have worked on a similar assignment and our student scored better and met their deadline. All our tasks are done from scratch, well researched and 100% unique, so entrust us with your assignment and I guarantee you will like our services and even engage us for your future tasks. Click below button to submit your specifications and get order quote

Get started

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

How it works

Place an order

Select the paper type, page limit, discipline, and format, and then set the deadline. Specify your paper instructions and attach the additional materials.

Track the progress

Check the finished parts of the paper and ask for amendments if necessary. Use the online chat for quick communication with the writer

Receive a paper

Release the payment when you are fully satisfied with the work. Leave feedback to share your experience with our writer.

Why our online essay writing service?

All types of paper writing help

Whether you need an essay, research paper, or dissertation, We have you covered. Our writers can create any kind of academic writing. Also, we can rewrite and edit your papers.

24/7 support

If you have questions about our service or need additional details to make a request, our friendly customer support will get your issues resolved.

On time delivery

Punctuality is our second name. Your order will be delivered strictly within the deadline. If you have an urgent order, we can do it! Our writers will need at least three hours to complete it.

Let us cover any of your writing needs!

Academic Paper Writing Service

Our best writers will gladly help you with:

Coursework / Homework

  • Homework Assignment
  • Engineering Assignment
  • Statistics Assignment
  • Biology Assignment
  • Nursing Assignment
  • Chemistry Assignment

Paperwork

  • Essay
  • Term Paper
  • Research Paper
  • Thesis / Dissertation
  • Research Proposal
  • Editing and proofreading

Others

  • Multiple Choice Questions
  • Short Answer Questions
  • Word Problems
  • Programming Assignment
  • Article Writing
  • Mathematics Calculations