We Offer Paper Writing Services on all Disciplines

Make an Order Now and we will be Glad to Help

Order Now



Ask a nursing expert to help you with your homework

We are ready to assist you anytime.

Order Now

Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

8/29/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301567_1&rubric_id=_169949_1 1/2

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

First Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6600_Week1_Discussion_Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

 

 

8/29/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16301567_1&rubric_id=_169949_1 2/2

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance CompeRubric Detail – Blackboard Learntent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement

Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Response: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

Second Response: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6600_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Exit

"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!":

Get started

How it works

Place an order

Select the paper type, page limit, discipline, and format, and then set the deadline. Specify your paper instructions and attach the additional materials.

Track the progress

Check the finished parts of the paper and ask for amendments if necessary. Use the online chat for quick communication with the writer

Receive a paper

Release the payment when you are fully satisfied with the work. Leave feedback to share your experience with our writer.

Why our online essay writing service?

All types of paper writing help

Whether you need an essay, research paper, or dissertation, We have you covered. Our writers can create any kind of academic writing. Also, we can rewrite and edit your papers.

24/7 support

If you have questions about our service or need additional details to make a request, our friendly customer support will get your issues resolved.

On time delivery

Punctuality is our second name. Your order will be delivered strictly within the deadline. If you have an urgent order, we can do it! Our writers will need at least three hours to complete it.

Let us cover any of your writing needs!

Academic Paper Writing Service

Our best writers will gladly help you with:

Coursework / Homework

  • Homework Assignment
  • Engineering Assignment
  • Statistics Assignment
  • Biology Assignment
  • Nursing Assignment
  • Chemistry Assignment

Paperwork

  • Essay
  • Term Paper
  • Research Paper
  • Thesis / Dissertation
  • Research Proposal
  • Editing and proofreading

Others

  • Multiple Choice Questions
  • Short Answer Questions
  • Word Problems
  • Programming Assignment
  • Article Writing
  • Mathematics Calculations